ANSI/NISO Z39.71-2006 (R2011) Holdings Statements for Bibliographic Items. (2011, June 23). Retrieved June 3, 2019, from https://www.niso.org/publications/z3971-2006-r2011.
Book Traces. Retrieved June 3, 2019, from http://www.booktraces.org/.
Codes, Guidelines, and Technical Standards Committee, Sharing and Transforming Access to Resources Section (STARS). “Interlibrary Loan Code for the United States.” United for Libraries, Prepared by the Interlibrary Loan Committee, Reference and User Services Association (RUSA) 2001, 5 Dec. 2017, https://www.ala.org/rusa/interlibrary-loan-code-united-states-explanatory-text.
Congress Network Development and MARC Standards Office. (2018, December 12). MARC PROPOSAL NO. 2019-01. Retrieved June 3, 2019, from http://www.loc.gov/marc/mac/2019/2019-01.html.
Crist, Rebecca, and Emily Stambaugh. Shared Print Programs. SPEC Kit 345. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries, December 2014. https://publications.arl.org/Shared-Print-Programs-SPEC-Kit-345/.
Demas, S. (2014). Policies For Shared Print Programs: Questions to Address in Writing a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). Against the Grain, 26(1). doi:https://www.against-the-grain.com/2014/03/v26-1-curating-collective-collections/.
Demas, S. (2014). Emerging Shared Print Policy Choices as Reflected in MOUs. Against the Grain, 26(2). doi:https://www.against-the-grain.com/2014/05/v26-2-curating-collective-collections/.
Demas, S. (2014). Shared Print MOUs: Thoughts on Future Coordination. Against the Grain, 26(3). doi:https://www.against-the-grain.com/2014/07/v26-3-curating-collective-collections/.
EAST: Eastern Academic Scholars’ Trust. (2016). Retrieved June 3, 2019, from https://eastlibraries.org/.
“Guidelines for Best Practice in Interlibrary Loan and Document Delivery.” IFLA World Library and Information Congress: 78th IFLA General Conference and Assembly | World Library and Information Congress, IFLA, 3 May 2018, www.ifla.org/publications/guidelines-for-best-practice-in-interlibrary-loan-and-document-delivery.
Kieft, Robert and Matthew Revitt (March 2019). Monograph Shared Print Agreements-Program Comparison. Retrieved June 3, 2019, from https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ey87zlwldx0qdS4sl7FN1xRlt-iV5dqp_U_glXBTFFE/edit#gid=1048108361.
Koch, Teresa and Welch, Andrew J. (2016) “Monograph Validation Strategies in Shared Print Programs: Variations and Value,” Collaborative Librarianship: Vol. 8 : Iss. 3 , Article 7. Available at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/collaborativelibrarianship/vol8/iss3/7.
Library of Congress Preservation & Digitization Actions: Terminology for MARC 21 Field 583. (2005, January 13). Retrieved June 3, 2019, from https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/583terms.html.
Library Storage Facilities Registry. Available online at: https://librarytechnology.org/storagefacilities/.
Malpas, Constance. 2009. Shared Print Policy Review Report. Report produced by OCLC Research. Published online at: https://www.webjunction.org/content/dam/research/publications/library/2009/2009-03.pdf
MARC 21 format for holdings data: Including guidelines for content designation. (2000). Washington: Library of Congress, Cataloging Distribution Service.
Miller, Mary, and Jennifer Teper, “Preserving the Past for the Future: Moving Toward Best Practices and Tools for Thoughtful Monographic Withdrawal.” Proceedings of the Charleston Library Conference. 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.5703/1288284316276.